Keyword Density Checker
Compute the most-used 1-, 2-, and 3-word phrases on any webpage or text block with their density percentages.
- Free · no sign-up
- Instant results
- Privacy-friendly
Other SEO Tools
What this measures
Enter a URL or paste text and you get the most frequent single words, two-word phrases and three-word phrases, each with a count and a density percentage — that phrase's share of total words on the page.
Looking at two- and three-word phrases alongside single words matters more than the raw numbers. Individual word counts are noisy; phrases are what reveal the actual topic. A page where "keyword density checker" appears as a recurring phrase is unambiguously about this tool, in a way that a high count for "keyword" alone never establishes.
There is no target percentage — and that is the point
The advice that you should aim for 1 to 3 percent density is the most persistent myth in on-page SEO. It comes from the late 1990s, when search engines genuinely did count keyword occurrences to determine relevance. That approach was trivially gamed, and it stopped working roughly two decades ago.
Modern search engines evaluate meaning rather than frequency. Systems built on natural language understanding recognise that a page about running shoes is relevant to "best trainers for marathon training" even when that phrase never appears, and they recognise a page that repeats an exact phrase forty times as manipulative rather than relevant. Google has stated plainly that keyword density is not something it uses as a ranking factor.
So do not write to hit a number. If you find yourself adding a phrase to reach a target, you are actively making the page worse.
What the tool is genuinely useful for
Density is diagnostic, not prescriptive. It is worth running for four specific reasons:
- Catching accidental over-optimisation. A phrase at 5 or 6 percent usually means the draft became repetitive — and repetitive text reads badly to humans long before it registers as spam to an algorithm.
- Confirming the page is about what you think it is. If the top phrases are navigation labels, your brand name, or boilerplate rather than your subject, the actual content is too thin relative to the template around it.
- Auditing a competitor's page to see which phrasing they favour — useful for spotting the vocabulary a topic conventionally uses.
- Finding what is missing. Often the more valuable insight is a term you expected to see and do not, which points at a genuine gap in coverage.
Placement beats frequency
Where a term appears carries far more weight than how often. The title tag, H1, opening paragraph, subheadings, image alt text, and the URL all signal topic strongly. One well-placed use in the title is worth more than a dozen scattered through the body.
What genuinely helps is covering the topic completely: the related concepts, common questions, and natural synonyms a knowledgeable writer would include anyway. That produces the semantic richness search engines actually reward — and it happens naturally when you write for a reader rather than for a percentage.
Reading your results sensibly
Common words dominate every text — "the", "and", "to" — and mean nothing. Look past them to the meaningful phrases. If your primary topic does not appear anywhere near the top, the page may be genuinely unfocused. If it appears far more than everything else combined, read the draft aloud; repetition that a tool flags is usually repetition a reader would feel.
When checking a URL rather than pasted text, remember that shared navigation and footer content is counted too. On a page with a large site-wide footer, template text can crowd out the real content — which is itself worth knowing, because search engines face the same problem distinguishing your page from every other page on the site.